A civic research operation for South Carolina. Audit, not advocacy; every figure sourced to a primary document.
Pragmatic, not progressive.Local, not ideological.Sourced, not opinionated.
Who can be watched
The first county-layer census: can a resident find the record of their county council’s meetings? Hover to preview; click a county to open the bodies within it.
The census
InternalCounty-layer census v1, compiled 2026-06-12 and evidence-URL-gated. Pending verification; shown here for review, not yet published.
County readout
South Carolina
Hover to preview a county; click it to open the bodies within. 46 county councils assessed.
Bright 21
Dim 16
Dark, by choice 2
Dark, no capacity found 6
Unknown 1
What the census found
01
Most of the county layer is already bright
Twenty-one of 46 county councils keep a durable, findable record of their meetings; only eight are dark at all. The darker map is at the town level.
02
Size does not decide brightness
Allendale, under 8,000 people, records to a durable archive; Cherokee, at 56,000, runs a full document platform and chooses not to. Investment is a decision, not a demographic.
03
Dim is a retention problem, not a recording one
The dim counties nearly all record; their archives are Facebook-only, login-walled, or quietly evaporating. The cheap statewide win is keeping the tape, not buying cameras.
04
Official self-descriptions cannot be trusted
One county's own video-archive page returns a 404; two counties' pages disagree with themselves on when they meet. The record has to be fetched, not asked for. That is why this census exists.
From census to audit
The census shows where the record can be found. An audit asks one sourced question of that record and answers it, yes or no.